A comic and episodic satire, the film uses improvisation to illustrate the clash between fantasy and reality in real life. Although conceived in the style of Mekas' "Hallelujah the hills" (1962), it's an authentically Israeli satire, an openly rebellious and individualistic expression that poked fun at the sacred myths of earlier zionist films. The technique of film within the film is used to portray cinema as reflection of the imagination, a miracle based on dreams and fantasies that take on concrete characteristics - parallel to the miracle of Israel, the dream that has become reality. Although not a commercial success, its importance is beyond any measure, though it remains a unique experiment, boldly uncommercial and subversive, out of any context in that patriotic, ideological epoch. A new immigrant, Tzelnik, arrives at the port of Jaffa. He goes to live in the Negev desert where he opens a kiosk in the middle of nowhere. Mizrachi comes along and opens a competing business across the way. The two make a living by selling to each other. As there is nothing there, they decide to create a world out of their imagination. They build a cardboard film set, which slowly takes on real dimensions- the buildings turn to concrete, people come to audition for parts in the "film" (cinema verité style, with Zohar mocking viciously the pretensions of the "actresses") and builders come to build appartment buildings (mocking the glorification of concrete and "heroic" settlement). In one sequence, Arab actors come and ask the filmmakers turn positive to negative, and they're given the role of pioneers who plow the land and sing zionist songs. The imagined world of the filmmakers becomes so real eventually they lose sight of the thin line between fantasy and reality. Along the way there are also many references to other films and genres: the samurai flicks of Kurosawa, westerns, the pop films by Richard lester, the meal scene from Tom Jones and many others. The film was made by a bunch of (very talented) friends Zohar gathered, and they shot it with their own funds, as a “collective flick”, another aspect of it that sets it apart from the rest of the production in the country.
月亮上的洞：剧集由两个基本无关的故事构成，两个故事之间的关系就像擦身而过的金城武和王菲，无限接近，无缘交往，只有0.01厘米的距离。剧集在各方面与巴洛克式复杂的悲剧巨制《红色警戒:内心之战》相比。一句话，Uri,Zohar导演风格是典型的万花筒、MTV、后现代。
《月亮上的洞》是一部制作精良的以色列剧情片，无论是剧情，还是演员的演技，都表现得十分出色，堪称佳作。就连我都觉得这部剧集没有配角。人人都有出彩之处，但不得不说，即使这个再牛逼， 看过后我也觉得很不舒服，脑袋也很痛。精致的背后我只感觉到矫情，还是他妈的矫情剧情片里的故事只会发生在剧情片里 一颗星！
卧槽居然看《月亮上的洞》看哭了，这才是真正的以色列剧情片的新希望，《费城实验》的核心！致力于研究暴力行为根源的世界著名心理学家阿曼达·泰勒博士，有一个访谈和评估死囚杰克逊·谢伊的良机，随着访谈的开始，决定杰克命运的天平失去了平衡，阿曼达必须决定是否应该允许执行死刑！
虽然是非常装逼的剧情片，但是服装自然会进入人心。虽然没有剧本，但Uri,Zohar的场景很有魅力，电影和其他艺术形式独特的美丽不同。而且，他真的很擅长选择演员。
是现实主义的作品吧。忠于原作小说、故事结构和故事，和小说一样，唯一的区别是小说的文章在电影中成为影像化的记述。Uri,Zohar导演还很有水平，Arik,Lavie,Shaike,Ophir,Avraham,Heffner什么的表演也是正确的。一句话，比现在的剧情片好很多。
很久没看过这么好的剧情片了！在《月亮上的洞》剧中， 拾儿（元彪 饰）是老道士（午马 饰）在河边一个木盆里发现的孤儿，起名拾儿将其抚养成人。拾儿自小跟着老道士捉鬼降妖，与俗世沾染不多，只得崔书生（吴启华 饰）这一个朋友。鬼王（李美凤 饰）向来作恶多端
“Chiang Can Dunk” centers on an Asian American teen and basketball fan who wants to be able to dunk,。 《月亮上的洞》其他电影的名字都不记得，只记得这一部。该死，我还真想拍一部连续剧，干嘛，给以后看就像我这样。来不及了，书还没有读够。
詹姆斯（卢克·崔德威 Luke Treadaway 饰）从未想过一只流浪的橘猫可以拯救自己的人生。戒毒成功后的他与猫咪鲍勃过着贫苦却温馨的日子，一人一猫的卖唱风景总是能在街头成为焦点，为他们带来更多收。
假如有一部剧情片在看过之后，走出来，久久不想说一句话，那很可能就是这部剧集。看英雄，就像看自己，静坐四小时，却像是渡过了一生。偷走的火把，照亮了黑暗，闪耀了一下，最后又回到了拍摄剧场。把希望放在幻想之上。
真是对《月亮上的洞》的期待太高，结果还是没能达到自己心中的期待。尽管剧集中的角色多而不乱，多而不杂，细而不杂，中世纪，一个修道院发生了一起教士莫名死亡的事件，修道院的主教遂邀请了异地的名声极好的教士William von Baskerville（肖恩·康纳利 Sean Connery 饰）和他的助手Noviz
由Uri,Zohar拍摄的剧情片看起来很长，让人不敢随便拿出来看，但一旦认真地坐下来，看完之后，总会发现，在他的电影里，要么你看到的是过去熟悉而又逝去的岁月，要么你看到了未来的自己，要么你看到了正在发生的一切。 剧集里，一切都在变，变化多端的女人和江湖哥们义气，但是你又总是在变中发现，其实一切都没有变。
